EALRGA home Newsletter
   
     

EAST ASIAN LIBRARY RESOURCES GROUP OF AUSTRALIA

Newsletter No. 63 (January 2014)


A short report on a survey of Asian Librarians in Australia - snapshot of academic and state library collections, July-August 2013

Michelle Hall

Liaison Librarian, Arts (Japanese Language and Studies, Arabic and Islamic Studies)
The University of Melbourne


 

Compiled by Michelle Hall for ALIM (Asian Libraries in Melbourne, a collaboration between Melbourne and Monash University Asian Collections)

Introduction
During July and August 2013 the members of ALIM (Asian Libraries in Melbourne, a collaborative effort between Monash and Melbourne universities’ Asian Collection librarians) conducted a survey of the academic and state libraries of each state and territory in Australia. We hoped to discover where Asian studies and language collections were held and where Asian studies library staff could be found in addition to the “known” large collections held at institutions in Canberra and Melbourne (and to a lesser extent, Sydney and Queensland). We were hoping to discover unknown colleagues with whom we could collaborate and share resources, and perhaps find new (to us) collections which we could make known to our regular library users.

We sent out a simple email survey and collated responses. There was a rather large non-response group (29%), which we will follow up as a next step.

Libraries surveyed
The following libraries (academic and state) were surveyed, with the responses below:

State or Territory

Response (28/39 or 71%)

No response (11/39 or 29%)

ACT

National Lib, Canberra U, ANU

 

NSW

Macquarie, Newcastle, Notre Dame, UTS, UNE, State Lib, UWS

Charles Sturt, UNSW, U Sydney, Aust Catholic U, Wollongong

NT

Charles Darwin

 

QLD

U Southern Queensland

U Queensland, Griffith, James Cook U, Southern Cross U

SA

UniSA, Flinders, U Adelaide, State Lib

 

TAS

U Tas

 

VIC

Deakin, La Trobe, Monash, RMIT, State Lib, Swinburne, Melbourne, Victoria

 

WA

Murdoch, UWA, Notre Dame

Edith Cowan, Curtin

‘Top’ libraries for Asia research
On the basis of responses received, the top libraries for Asian studies, in terms of numbers of staff (2 or more) and coverage of language/country areas are perhaps as we may have expected:

Institution

Number of specialists

Language areas

Comments

National Library Canberra

6 (7 if you include the manager of the Jakarta office)

China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macau, Japan, Korea, Indonesia, Thailand, Laos, East Timor, Malaysia, Brunei, The Philippines, Singapore, Vietnam

 

Aust. National University Library

3 (currently)

China, Japan, Korea, Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand, Burma, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Central Asia

Under review

Monash University

3

China, Japan, Korea, Indonesia, South East Asia

Chinese position unfilled since July 2013

Uni Technology Sydney

3

Primarily China, some Japan

all Chinese-speaking staff

U Melbourne

2.1

China, Japan

Dr Aline Scott-Maxwell from Monash comes once/fortnight to assist with Indonesian queries

Macquarie U

2

China, Japan

East Asian collection has been intershelved with main English collection

Charles Darwin

2

Timor Leste, Indonesia and China

 

Libraries with at least one specialist Asian studies librarian

Institution

Number of specialists (designated “Asian librarians,” not necessarily language specialists)

Language areas

Comments

LaTrobe

1

?

No details given

UWA

1

?

No details given

Response rate
Methodology for the survey involved contacting individual librarians already known to us, or using the contact email on the library website.  Often there was no clear way of contacting the Asia collection and the email would be sent to a generic “contact the library” address. This is possibly why the response rate was 71% (28 of 39 institutions surveyed). It is nevertheless a reasonable response rate and can be improved upon in future reviews. It is possible that the institutions which have not responded are those which have no Asian collection at all, although other institutions did respond and indicate that.

Discussion
Anecdotal evidence from students and researchers is that they use the main libraries with Asian collections as default study/resource centres by using interlibrary loans/document delivery.

Many libraries without sizeable collections are at institutions where the Asian Studies component of subjects is minimal, for example, one student’s special project rather than an ongoing unit of study.

Several librarians with nominal responsibility for whatever Asian materials are held by their library have never been asked for help with those materials during the years of their tenure – either the students don’t need help, or perhaps they don’t use the collection.

Many libraries do not have specialist staff (not just in Asian studies and languages), and all enquiries are answered by whoever is rostered on that day. This seems to be an increasingly common approach.  

Discussion at the Asian Studies Association of Australia council meeting, November 2013
As the library representative on the ASAA council I brought the results of this survey to the meeting held in early November, 2013.

I was told of several interesting and priceless collections by the academic members of the council, but had not heard of them from library staff; I will follow up on these in the next phase of the survey.

It was interesting to note that the council members were surprised there was no national-level collection development policy in place, and that policies such as last-copy retention were largely up to the individual (local) librarian. There was strong support for a national collection development policy and strong support for libraries in general, which is pleasing.

 

 
   
     

Page last updated: February 2014
Please direct all enquiries to the editor, Ms Ayako Hatta Ayako.Hatta@monash.edu
Web maintainer: Jung-Sim Kim, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
This web page is copyright. It may be linked to any other Web pages, but contents may not be altered.